Outline / Summary Cheadle Unite Together Reasons About Us NEWS Councillors/SMDC Wider Aims
Cheadle Unite

News

This Page contains ongoing news

Click on ‘Outline / Summary’ above for an overview


Click

Clin

2017 Aug: Consultation !! 2016 May: Consultation (Again!) 2015 Aug: Consultation Notes 2015 July: Letter to Minister 2015 June: SMDC Consultation 2015 May: Election Statements 2015 APRIL: HOUSING MINISTER 2015 April: Community Brief Pt1 2015 April: Community Brief Pt2 2015 Mar: Letter to BC MP 2015 March: SMDC SCI 2015 Feb: Letter to SMDC 2014 Oct: Petition 'Together' 2014 Aug: SMDC To Bill Cash 2014 July: Response to 190 in CE 2014 June: Bill Cash MP Response 2014 June:Letter To Bill Cash MP 2014 June:Stats For Bill Cash MP 2014 Apr: Community Involvement 2013 Sept: Cheadle East Housing 2013 Aug:Post Planning Comment 2013 Jan: Pre-Planning Comments 2012 Nov: Planning Examination 2012 Jan: Cheadle North Housing 2011 Dec: Revised Core Strategy 2011 Jan: Letter To Council 2010 Dec: Cheadle Town Plan 2010 Oct: Cheadle Town Plan 2010 Jul: Council Vote 2010 May: U-Turn on Housing 2010 Apr: Election Statements 2010 Apr: LDF

Headline News

Outline / Summary Cheadle Unite Together Reasons About Us NEWS Councillors/SMDC Wider Aims
Cheadle Unite

BETA Release Site Update May 2016:

Content is under construction

errors may exist

Together’


2014 July: Cheadle Unite Response to SMDC Regarding Housing Proposals 2/3

          

The Planning inspector Patrick Whitehead (operating under National Planning Policy) also made it clear that SMDC plans should still tally with the Regional Spatial Strategy in any transition to the Localism Act.

We therefore now hope that the Localism Act also provides a similar common sense opportunity, for Regeneration and Brownfield site redevelopment to take precedence before building on Greenfield and agricultural sites.   

 We acknowledge that early news reports about the new Conservative led National Planning Policy Framework (which encompasses the Localism Act) indicated that the policy is heavily pro-development (to put it mildly).  For example the Guardian wrote about the new policy in September 2011: “In other words, you'll be allowed to give developers what they want. You will not be allowed to prevent developers from wrecking your neighbourhood.”

However we can see from your own Core Strategy document that there are opportunities for changes to our housing allocation in the Localism Act.


For example :

2.26 Duty to Co-operate requires neighbouring local authorities including County Councils and other public bodies to engage constructively, actively and on an on-going basis on cross boundary matters (e.g. levels of housing, employment, road links etc).


2.27 Local Councils are required to demonstrate compliance with the duty to co-operate as part of the examination of Local Plans. If a Council cannot adequately demonstrate that it has complied with the duty, it's Local Plan will fail the independent examination


Large numbers of Residents have already made it clear through numerous representations that Cheadle are opposed to excessive development proposals for Cheadle and have had no counter claims presented by SMDC. It is therefore reasonable to request SMDC clarify the position (i.e. factual barriers and restrictions) in writing to residents, should they exist.  The above letter to central government would help if the position is genuinely unclear.  SMDC is in control of timescales responses etc and impacts on planning approvals. Residents are not.


Cheadle Unite have made requests that SMDC interact with the Potteries and Stoke-on-Trent in order to ensure regeneration takes place on the many Brownfield sites that exist around the Potteries. Sites that require support following the collapse of the ‘Renew’ Project. We have had feedback from Councillors indicating that no known efforts are ongoing. For example, one Councillor has responded :


As far as I know as a council we have not been told at any meeting that SMDC is working with Stoke to see if they are willing to take some of the housing allocation, the only rumour I heard is that Bill Cash MP may be looking into it’


Cheadle Unite has already made a request in our response (April 2014) to the ‘Statement of Community Involvement’ Point 5 requesting:


Residents would like transparency on the internal financial drivers and motivators with traceability and an accountability diagram within the hierarchy of SMDC, including access to levels of senior and executive staff pay and any bonus schemes included in the ‘Statement of Community Involvement’ or any other equally promoted and circulated material. The level of detail requested is in response to the disparity between what many would regard as a common sense strategy for the environment and community and actual policies to date.

The above request is made not through malice but a genuine desire to understand how SMDC is driven. Our interpretation of feedback from Councillors is that SMDC do their own thing. We look to SMDC to prove this is not the case through empowering our councillors to work for our local communities and for SMDC to see section 2.26 as an opportunity to collaborate with our City which needs the support of the surrounding areas to promote regeneration and genuine sustainability. This has to sit above politics it is something we would all benefit from.


Finally it is important to convey that Cheadle is not anti-development and that we want a far more positive interaction moving forward with SMDC. Our Letter to Bill Cash MP highlights that 1320 dwellings equates to a 26% growth in our population against a backdrop of a predicted growth of 5%

The  figures are as follows:

  Cheadle       1320*2.4 = 3168 new residents 12,166 population = 26.0% growth

Leek             1650*2.4 = 3960 new residents 19,880 population = 19.9% growth

Biddulph      1100*2.4 = 2640 new residents 19,512 population = 13.5% growth

Rural Areas  1540*2.4 = 3690 new residents 51,188 (remainder) = 7.2% growth


   *Note If the 2026 5% growth prediction is based on the 2007 70% Migration ratio (we believe it is), then the actual local demand prediction is only 1.5% and SMDC’s target provision of 14.1% is nearly 10x that for Staffordshire Moorlands.

Page 3




Regarding the Housing Numbers

Cheadle has already accommodated the following housing provision

 154 completions since 2006

 86 current commitments

Looks likely to already accommodate (to 2031)

 441 houses in urban sites

 250 Houses in area 1

Total 931

If SMDC can move the 389 shortfall to regeneration around the Potteries as a priority our growth is still very high:


Cheadle  931*2.4 = 2234 new residents 12,166 population = 18.4% growth


This would avoid fresh site allocations and hopefully lead to a positive future between Cheadle Residents and SMDC.

Cheadle Unite.

28th July 2014

Ian Lewis - Chairman  Greg Powell –Secretary (07596 123567)

28 Rockingham Drive,  62 Rakeway Road,

Cheadle,   Cheadle,

Stoke-on-Trent,   Stoke-on-Trent,

ST10 1YT.   ST10 1QH.


  1320 Houses/Dwellings Still Planned for Cheadle    250 Houses In Cheadle North East       190 Houses *NOW Applied for In Cheadle East

  26%+ Swell in Our Population Planned in 12 years   441 In Urban Sites Around Cheadle    200 Properties on Small Urban Extensions

  More Traffic/Pollution. Services stretched                  124 Builds Already Completed               86+ Developments already agreed

  To receive our emails contact us at cheadleunite@dsl.pipex.com                                                   *Deadline for comments 30th July 2014