Outline / Summary Cheadle Unite Together Reasons About Us NEWS Councillors/SMDC Wider Aims
Cheadle Unite


This Page contains ongoing news

Click on ‘Outline / Summary’ above for an overview



2018 July: Planning Inspection 2017 Aug: Consultation !! 2016 May: Consultation (Again!) 2015 Aug: Consultation Notes 2015 July: Letter to Minister 2015 June: SMDC Consultation 2015 May: Election Statements 2015 APRIL: HOUSING MINISTER 2015 April: Community Brief Pt1 2015 April: Community Brief Pt2 2015 Mar: Letter to BC MP 2015 March: SMDC SCI 2015 Feb: Letter to SMDC 2014 Oct: Petition 'Together' 2014 Aug: SMDC To Bill Cash 2014 July: Response to 190 in CE 2014 June: Bill Cash MP Response 2014 June:Letter To Bill Cash MP 2014 June:Stats For Bill Cash MP 2014 Apr: Community Involvement 2013 Sept: Cheadle East Housing 2013 Aug:Post Planning Comment 2013 Jan: Pre-Planning Comments 2012 Nov: Planning Examination 2012 Jan: Cheadle North Housing 2011 Dec: Revised Core Strategy 2011 Jan: Letter To Council 2010 Dec: Cheadle Town Plan 2010 Oct: Cheadle Town Plan 2010 Jul: Council Vote 2010 May: U-Turn on Housing 2010 Apr: Election Statements 2010 Apr: LDF 2010 Spring: Statements 2010 Jan: Councillor Statements

Headline News

Outline / Summary Cheadle Unite Together Reasons About Us NEWS Councillors/SMDC Wider Aims
Cheadle Unite

BETA Release Site Update May 2016:

Content is under construction

errors may exist


2013 January: Comments To the Planning Inspector

24th January 2013 - Supplementary Information For the Planning Inspector Examination Programme. (Page 1/2)

The Following document has been submitted to the Planning Inspector - Patrick Whitehead for consideration during the Examination of the SMDC Core Strategy.

Patrick Whitehead,

C/O Pippa Home,

Programme Officer,

High Peak Borough Council,                                                                                    23rd January 2013

Dear Mr Whitehead,

Cheadle Unite would like to present the following supplementary details as part of your Examination of SMDC Housing Development proposals for Cheadle.

The Wider Picture and the Regional Spatial Strategy

Cheadle Unite have presented SMDC with 2 sets of representations regarding housing development in Cheadle, one for M28 (areas 6&7) Jan 2010 and a second for M95 (Areas 1&2) Feb 2012 (both representations numbered respondent 600 by SMDC). We have also submitted 2 representations with for’s and against aspects of the Cheadle Town Masterplan (December 2010). As Cheadle Unite have co-ordinated resident responses, we request that you take time to read the concise contents of both above housing representations (held by SMDC) as context for the following additional comments.

On both occasions regarding housing, Cheadle Unite have highlighted significant concerns at the housing allocation numbers for Cheadle. Our understanding is that the Planning Inspector’s role is to consider the soundness of the proposals presented by SMDC in the context of an ongoing link to the Regional Spatial Strategy.

The Regional Spatial Strategy for our area includes the areas of the city of Stoke-on-Trent and the six towns (collectively known as the Potteries). Assessment of impact on the environment, employment and long term infrastructure sustainability of both the Potteries and Staffordshire Moorlands are therefore clearly linked and interdependent as are imposed housing allocation numbers from Government (and any suggestion that they are not is clearly wrong and hopefully will be addressed with a positive perspective by your examination).

Any regeneration of the Stoke-on-Trent areas will without doubt score very highly on a sustainability assessment of these areas desperately requiring redevelopment. The collapse of the ‘Renew’ project in Stoke-on-Trent is clearly documented for example by the BBC Inside out documentary (14th November 2011). In tackling the regeneration of Stoke-on-Trent, housing development in these areas must take priority. They are facing declining retail usage in town centres and a decline in retail unit occupancy. They are also very likely to require redevelopment for housing provision in a future where, for example, significant shopping is done via the internet with a direct link from warehouse to home. In addition there exist significant numbers of brown-field and derelict sites within the Potteries which desperately need investment and re-development. These areas are capable of providing affordable quality housing where solid infrastructure already exists.  Options for planners to build on Greenfield sites many miles from Stoke city centre will detract from tackling the stated objectives of the Regional Spatial Strategy and a sustainable post fossil fuel based economy. SMDC’s plans for Cheadle to be a commuter town for the Potteries are seriously flawed in the medium to long term. ‘Peak oil’ flow of conventional crude oil has already been predicted to have occurred in 2006 by the International Energy Agency (IEA) and even optimistic predictions  by various reputable organisations see a decline in natural fuels production by 2020 (this information is available via a search on ‘Peak Oil’ and numerous reputable links ). The only reason this is not more evident at this time is because the global recession has currently lowered demand.

In the original Cheadle Unite representations mentioned above, it was highlighted that the existing world fuel reserves are likely to only last between 25-50 Years (Peak oil flow in the USA occurred way back in the 1970’s). While existing alternative energies can help, their impact will be significantly restricted, once demand of fossil fuels clearly outstrips supply and areas with an ineffective sustainability policy and a high distance daily commute to employment will be at a significant disadvantage.

Employment prospects for Cheadle residents are very limited within the town. A sizeable percentage of Cheadle workers are employed in the Potteries area. In assessing future employability, the SMDC plan therefore has to incorporate a long term correlation with development and regeneration of the Potteries.

Cheadle Unite therefore request that the Planning Inspector look into evidence of clear co-operation and collaboration with the Potteries (as in the context of the Regional Spatial Strategy) regarding any strategic development of Cheadle. To clarify, that is not emails of light touch coffee events, but of detailed collaborative planning on housing developments in and around major A-roads (A500 for example), alongside Rail and canal transport networks. In addition, a clear priority for development on Potteries brown-field sites were sizeable infrastructure already exists for the long- term and where a future decline in fossil fuel dependent transport can be effectively addressed. The evidence should clearly detail how those sites will be developed before considering development on Greenfield Agricultural land sites, many miles from our valued city and areas of major employment.

Cheadle has and is only served by narrow roads and in a post fossil fuel based economy could easily become isolated and unsustainable if the local population to employment ratio is allowed to rise. There is no substantive evidence from SMDC that a 25% increase in employment within Cheadle or the SMDC area will occur to meet the increased numbers of houses and residents being proposed. Cheadle has historic geographic restrictions on its ability to expand.

Local issues for Cheadle

Cheadle Unite recognises a need for some housing developments especially to meet the needs of the local community.  The revised submission promotes significant development of the North East in Areas 1 and 2 over areas 4 and 5. It is unclear to Cheadle Unite why areas in the North East are given clear development priority over the South West, in the context of the SMDC sustainability appraisal produced in August 2012.

The promotion of a school in the North East is considered by many as invalid. Research carried out by Cheadle Unite concurred with the view that a School is unlikely to get funded as there is already significant spare capacity in the existing schools.

For well over a decade there has been discussion of a south-west bypass between Moberley and Brookhouses. While there is contentious debate as to the value of the bypass ,the Town Masterplan 2009 and onward and proposed over the future period (commissioned by SMDC themselves) in

Page 2


This Page contains details of news updates

Click on Outline for an overview